Presentation reference rubric#
Thorough Understanding |
Good Understanding |
Basic Understanding |
Poor/No Understanding |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Organization |
Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable and is skillful and makes the content of the presentation cohesive. |
Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable within the presentation. |
Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is intermittently observable within the presentation. |
Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is not observable within the presentation. |
Language |
Language choices are memorable, compelling, and enhance the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. |
Language choices are thoughtful and generally support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. |
Language choices are mundane and commonplace and partially support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. |
Language choices are unclear and minimally support the effectiveness of the presentation. Language in presentation is not appropriate to audience. |
Delivery |
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation compelling, and speaker appears polished and confident. |
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation interesting, and speaker appears comfortable. |
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation understandable, and speaker appears tentative. |
Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) detract from the understandability of the presentation, and speaker appears uncomfortable. |
Supporting Material |
A variety of types of supporting materials (explanations, illustrations, statistics) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that significantly supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s credibility/authority on the topic. |
Supporting materials (explanations, illustrations, statistics) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that generally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s credibility/authority on the topic. |
Supporting materials (explanations, illustrations, statistics) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that partially supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s credibility/authority on the topic. |
Insufficient supporting materials (explanations, illustrations, statistics) make reference to information or analysis that minimally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s credibility/authority on the topic. |
Central Message |
Central message is precisely stated and strongly supported. |
Central message is clear and consistent with the supporting material. |
Central message is basically understandable but is not memorable. |
Central message can be deduced, but is not explicitly stated in the presentation. |